Radiological findings of rhizarthrosis and their usefulness for therapeutic decision-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37910/RDP.2026.15.1.e444Keywords:
Rhizarthrosis, Radiological Dindings, Therapeutic Decision, Eaton–Littler ClassificationAbstract
Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition characterized by pain, weakness, and functional limitation. Although radiographic classifications estimate structural severity, their correlation with clinical symptoms and therapeutic decision-making remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic findings of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis in patients treated at Policlínica Metropolitana de Caracas and determine their usefulness as a criterion for therapeutic decisions between January 2024 and October 2025. Methods: An observational, analytical, retrospective study was conducted. A total of 63 patients aged >35 years with a clinical diagnosis of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis were included. Clinical and radiographic variables were recorded, and severity was classified using the Eaton–Littler scale. Statistical analysis included descriptive methods, linear regression (VAS pain vs. Eaton grade), Spearman correlation, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Most patients were female (65.1 %), with a predominance of the 61–70-year age group (28.6 %). All patients reported thumb base pain, mostly within VAS 5–7 (77.8 %). Mild joint-space narrowing was the most frequent radiographic finding (71.4 %), and Eaton grade II was the most prevalent stage (71.4 %). Linear regression showed a significant association between radiographic severity and pain (β = 0.72; p < 0.001; R² = 0.322). Radiographic severity was strongly correlated with surgical indication (ρ = 0.69; p < 0.001). Surgical treatment was more frequent in Eaton grades III and IV. Conclusion: Radiographic severity was significantly associated with pain intensity and therapeutic decision-making, with surgical treatment being more common in advanced stages of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.
Downloads
References
1. Shapiro LM, McQuillan TJ, Kerkhof FD, Ladd A. Radiographic progression of thumb CMC osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020; 2(6): 343-348.
2. Nelson B, Zama R, Sanghavi KK, Giladi AM, Means KR Jr. Assessing correlations between radiographic classification and patient-reported outcome measures for symptomatic thumb CMC osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025; 7(3): 100702.
3. Safiri S, Almasi-Hashiani A, Nejadghaderi SA, Rankin J, Collins GS, Kolahi AA, et al. Global burden of osteoarthritis in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2021: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. PLoS One. 2023; 18(12): e0324296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324296.
4. Haugen IK, Englund M, Aliabadi P, Niu J, Clancy M, Kvien TK, et al. Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021; 46(1): 48-56. doi:10.1177/1753193420947680.
5. Ferreira Santos J, Pinto R, Chua C. Cross-country burden of osteoarthritis in Latin America and the Caribbean from 1990–2021: a benchmarking analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2022. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75(suppl 9). Disponible en: acrabstracts.org
6. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Informe de país: Venezuela 2022. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2022. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/es/documentos/informe-pais-venezuela-2022
7. Carità E, Donadelli A, Laterza M, Rossettini G, Villafañe JH, Perazzini PG. Predictive accuracy of the Eaton–Littler classification in thumb CMC osteoarthritis: comparative analysis with Outerbridge. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(16): 1703.
8. Hall AJ. Relationships between diagnostic imaging of first CMC osteoarthritis and pain, function and disease progression: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2024; 32(…): S1063-4584(23)01018-X.
9. Sharma A, El-Sayed A, Mohamed M. Diagnostic potential of MRI of the first carpometacarpal joint compared with plain radiography in nodal hand OA. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020; 51: 261.
10. Bouredoucen H, Abs B, Ferreira Branco D, Buzzi M, Poletti P-A, Piguet E, et al. Trapeziometacarpal joint imaging: MRI, US and CT compared with cadaveric specimens. Eur J Radiol. 2024; 169: 111148.
11. Sharma R. National trends of surgical interventions for thumb CMC arthritis (2010–2022). J Hand Surg Am. 2025; 50: S0363-5023(25)00155-8.
12. Ishibashi S, Kodama A, Tanaka T. First metacarpal extension-abduction osteotomy: CT-based subchondral bone density and arthroscopic changes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20: 407.
13. Hsu AR, Dunn JC. Comparison of surgical techniques and joint injections for base-of-thumb arthritis: updated systematic review. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024;1006xx.
14. HispanoPost. Policlínica Metropolitana trajo a Venezuela novedoso tratamiento: colaboraron especialistas del Institut de la Mà. 31 jul 2025. Disponible en: https://acortar.link/1REnQ8
15. Wolf JM. Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: epidemiology and occupational load. Lund: Lund University; 2014.
16. Calfee R. Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022; 104(23): e96.
17. Kennedy CD, Manske MC, Huang JI. Classifications in brief: The Eaton–Littler classification of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(12): 2729–2733.
18. Hoffler CE, Matzon JL, Lutsky KF. Radiographic stage does not correlate with symptom severity in thumb basilar joint osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23(12): 778–782.
19. Moretti A, Iolascon G, Gimigliano R. Pain, upper limb function and radiological changes in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Beyond Rheumatol. 2022; 4: e398.
20. Vermeulen GM, Slijper H, Feitz R. Surgical management of primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36(1): 157–169.
21. Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (2): CD004631.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yohani Carolina López Blanco, María Elena Savino Ramos, Martín Arturo Abreu Lebrum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
- para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
-
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.







