Public policies and their impact on the development of science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37883/GID.10.2.2025.05Keywords:
science, technology, policies, complexity, VICA2Abstract
Science and technology have played an important role as a driving force behind human progress in recent centuries. However, scientific and technological development cannot advance in an uncontrolled manner, because it requires policies that channel and direct activity, giving it responsibility and commitment, and an ethical dimension in response to the demands of the community and complex environments. Policies serve as a means of learning, as a dynamic response to environmental change, through a proactive and collaborative process among stakeholders, focused on the community. Numerous factors, including development strategies, international policy guidelines, recommendations from international organizations, and societal conceptions of the role of science and technology, have influenced the development of science and technology policies in South America. In Venezuela, policies have shaped the development of a concept centered on socially inclusive approaches. However, there is still a need to refine policies for conceiving an alternative and dynamic strategy to integrate science and technology into social, sustainable, and viable development, in a context as demanding as the VICA2. This research aims to open a window for discussion, exploring the importance of public policies on science and technology in developing countries. It also presents evidence of transformative strategies and practices employed by various nations to promote technological progress, with a focus on the well-being of their communities
Downloads
References
Abma, T. A., Cook, T., Rämgård, M., Kleba, E., Harris, J., & Wallerstein, N. (2017). Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. Educational action research, 25(4), 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092
Arciénaga A., Nielsen J., Bacarini H., Martinelli S., Kofuji S., y García J. (2018) Technology and innovation management in higher education—cases from Latin America and Europe. Adm Sci [Internet]. 8(2):11. Http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020011.
Avery, H., Sjögren, K., & Rämgård, M. (2022). Empowering communities with health promotion labs: result from a CBPR programme in Malmö, Sweden. Health promotion international, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab069
Belone, L., Lucero, J. E., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Baker, E. A., Chan, D., & Wallerstein, N. (2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: Community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative health research, 26(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557084
Bernstein LE. (2014). The perceived importance of VUCA-driven skills for 21st-century leader success and the extent of integration of those skills into leadership development programs. Doctoral Thesis. School of Education. Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa. USA. Scholar Share @ Deake. https://escholarshare.drake.edu/handle/2092/2035
Casas, R., Corona, J. M., & Rivera, R. (2014). Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación en América Latina: entre la competitividad y la inclusión social. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas en el Estudios Social de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y el Conocimiento. México: Siglo XXI, 1-22. http://s1.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/lalics/papers/115_Politicas_de_Ciencia_Tecnologia_e_Innovacion_en_America_Latina_entre_la_competitividad_y_la_inclusion_social.pdf
Cedeño, J. (2022). La comunalización de las ciencias en la producción. Perspectivas: Revista de Historia, Geografía, Arte y Cultura, 10(19), 72-83. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8859342.pdf
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2018). Datos, algoritmos y políticas: la redefinición del mundo digital. (LC/CMSI.6/4), Santiago.
Comisión de Comunidad Europea. (2007). Green paper ‘The European Research Area: New perspectives’. COM(2007) 161. Brussels, Belgium. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/the-european-research-area-era-new-perspectives.html
Comisión Europea. (2013). Horizon 2020. Work Programme 2014–2015. Science with and for Society. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/main/h2020-wp1415-swfs_en.pdf
Comisión Europea. (2016). Open innovation, open science, open to the world: a vision for Europe. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?. Zed books.
Corbin, J. H., Mittelmark, M. B. (2008). Partnership lessons from the Global Programme for Health Promotion Effectiveness: a case study. Health promotion international, 23(4), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dan029
Corbin, J. H., Jones, J., & Barry, M. M. (2018). What makes intersectoral partnerships for health promotion work? A review of the international literature. Health promotion international, 33(1), 4-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw061
Ferrarotti F. (2019). Science, for What? Or: Science with Conscience - The Invisible College of Dissenting Nuclear Scientists. Academicus International Scientific Journal, Issue: 20, Volume: 20, Page: 12-33. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2019.20.02
Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374-386). Routledge. Versión original 1971.
Fundación Europea de la Ciencia. (2013). Science in Society: Caring for our Futures in Turbulent Times. Science Policy Briefing. June.
Garista P. Pace EM. Barry M. Contu P. Battle-Kirk B. Pocetta G. (2015). The impact of an international online accreditation system on pedagogical models and strategies in higher education. Res. Edu. Media, 7. https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2015-0006
Hadorn, G. H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Joye, D., Pohl, C., ... & Zemp, E. (2008). The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. Handbook of transdisciplinary research, 19-39. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Holger-Hoffmann-Riem/publication/225880759_The_Emergence_of_Transdisciplinarity_as_a_Form_of_Research/links/0deec5275f9a2da592000000/The-Emergence-of-Transdisciplinarity-as-a-Form-of-Research.pdf#page=35
Holkup, P. A., Tripp-Reimer, T., Salois, E. M., & Weinert, C. (2004). Community-based participatory research: an approach to intervention research with a Native American community. Advances in nursing science, 27(3), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200407000-00002
Kerzner H. The Growth of Project Complexity in a VUCA World. (2020). International Institute for Learning (IIL). https://www.iil.com/white-papers/white-paper-the-growth-of-project-complexity-in-a-vuca-world/
Koskinen, I. (2015). Changing research communities: Essays on objectivity and relativism in contemporary cultural research. Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 47. https://helda.helsinki.fi/items/25985399-68c6-4466-8809-5d0c4b569201
Lindacher, V., Curbach, J., Warrelmann, B., Brandstetter, S., & Loss, J. (2018). Evaluation of empowerment in health promotion interventions: a systematic review. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 41(3), 351-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278716688065
Martínez, R., Palma, A., & Velásquez, A. M. (2020). Revolución tecnológica e inclusión social: reflexiones sobre desafíos y oportunidades para la política social en América Latina.
Mihaela D. Amalia D. Bogdan G. (2015). The partnership between academic and business environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 180, 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.120
Ministerio del Poder Popular para Ciencia y Tecnología. (13 de agosto de 2024). Mincyt: 25 años de soberanía científica-tecnológica en beneficio del pueblo – Mincyt. https://mincyt.gob.ve/mincyt-25-anos-soberania-cientifica-tecnologica/
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Assembly, U. G. (2022). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2015. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n15/291/89/pdf/n1529189.pdf?token=AlZ9nd4heRuG1lqhwZ&fe=true
Pérez S. MP. (2021). ¿Cuáles son las nuevas competencias blandas que las empresas de América Latina deben desarrollar en sus colaboradores para responder a la nueva realidad causada por la pandemia del Covid-19?. http://repository.uamerica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.11839/8729/1/58580-2021-2-GTH.pdf
Real Academia de la Lengua Española. (2023). Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed., [versión 23.7 en línea]. https://dle.rae.es [11/03/2024].
Riccardi B. Resta S. Resta G. (2023). Science and technology, whose is the primacy for?. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 17(1), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8053836
Rojas, N. (13 de marzo de 2024). Programa Nacional de Semilleros Científicos: formando el futuro. https://mincyt.gob.ve/programa-nacional-semilleros-cientificos-formando-futuro/
Smith, L.T. (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Specht, M. I. (2021). Ante la Pandemia, un nuevo enfoque de análisis de entorno para las organizaciones. http://saber.ucv.ve/bitstream/10872/21242/1/Trabajo%20Definitivo%20Maria%20Isabel%20Specht.%20Trabajo%20completoC.%20AVEGID.26-05-2021-FINAL-1.pdf
Specht, M.I., Villarroel A. (2022). Nuevo enfoque de gestión de proyectos de investigación, desarrollo e innovación (I+D+i). Ciencia en revolución Vol. 8, N° 24. www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356014
Ulnicane, I. (2016). 'Grand Challenges' concept: a return of the'big ideas' in science, technology and innovation policy?. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 11(1-3), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078378
Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J. G., & Minkler, M. (Eds.). (2018). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
