Producing innovative ideas in education. A bibliometric approach to Design thinking
Keywords:
Scientific mapping, Design thinking, Education, Innovation, EvolutionAbstract
The objective of the article is to carry out a bibliometric review on the use of Design Thinking in the field of education in the Scopus database. The findings include a summary of the most important scientific articles and journals in the subject area, as well as the most prolific and prominent authors, organizations, and nations. The growth rate found is 17.27% and an average of citations close to 13 citations per published document. These results show that the topic is of importance and significance today for both scientific journals and researchers. The study has addressed the implications for theory and practice of this approach, providing a comprehensive overview of the expected impacts of Design Thinking in education.
Downloads
References
Andrews, D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local economy, 30(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215578226
Aris, N., Ibrahim, N., Abd halim, N., Ali, S., Rusli, N., Nabila, M., & Hassan, F. (2022). Evaluating The Academic Trends On Design Thinking Research: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2000 to 2021. 6, 1022-1038. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 1022-1038. http://journalppw.com
Bhandari, A. (2022). Design Thinking: From Bibliometric Analysis to Content Analysis, Current Research Trends, and Future Research Directions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00920-3
Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collins.
Colmenares-Quintero, R. F., Caicedo-Concha, D. M., Rojas, N., Stansfield, K., & Colmenares-Quintero, J. C. (2023) Problem based learning and design thinking methodologies for teaching renewable energy in engineering programs: Implementation in a Colombian university context. Cogent Engineering, 10(1), 2164442. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2164442
Chen, X., & Zhang, B. (2020). Hybrid Teaching Practice Exploration of Design Thinking and Methodology Course for the Reform of Design Innovation Education. DEStech Transactions on Economics, Business and Management, 0(eeim), Article eeim. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtem/eeim2020/35176
Delen, İ., Özüdoğru, F., Demir, K., Buber, A., Erdogmus, Y. K., Demir, E. B. K., Coban, G. U., & Akpinar, E. (2023). Understanding design education with a bibliometric approach: A story of 50 years. Research in Engineering Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-023-00425-3
Dinić, B., & Jevremov, T. (2021). Trends in research related to the Dark Triad: A bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology, 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00250-9
Dragičević, N., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2023). Design thinking capabilities in the digital world: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of management learning & education, 5(4), 512-523.
Eklund, A. R., Aguiar, U. N., & Amacker, A. (2022). Design thinking as sense-making: Developing a pragmatist theory of practice to (re)introduce sensibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39, 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12604
Galvão, N. M. dos S., & Schneider, H. N. (2023). Design Thinking na educação: Um estudo bibliométrico em pesquisas internacionais. Revista Ibero-Americana De Estudos Em Educação, 18(00), e023107. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v18i00.17667
Geng, D., Feng, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Sustainable design for users: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 29824-29836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09283-1
Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. Int J Technol Des Educ 33, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z
Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), 1275-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
He, W., Yan, J., Wang, C., Liao, L., & Hu, X. (2023). Exploring the impact of the design thinking model on fifth graders’ creative self-efficacy, situational interest, and individual interest in STEM education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101424
Hews, R., Beligatamulla, G., & McNamara, J. (2023). Creative Confidence and Thinking Skills for Lawyers: Making sense of design thinking pedagogy in legal education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101352
Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems Thinking: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Systems, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8030023
Jamal, T., Kircher, J., & Donaldson, J. P. (2021). Re-Visiting Design Thinking for Learning and Practice: Critical Pedagogy, Conative Empathy. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020964
Jin, Y. (2021). Play, Design, Create, Fail, Teach, and Repeat: A Design Case Of Designing a Maker Education Course for Preservice Teachers. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v12i1.25857
Johann, D. A., Nunes, A. de F. P., Santos, G. B. dos, Silva, D. J. C. da, Bresciani, S. A. T., & Lopes, L. F. D. (2020). Mapping of scientific production on design thinking as a tool for entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric study of a decade. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-05-2019-0028
Kara, M. (2018). A systematic literature review: Constructivism in multidisciplinary learning environment. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1–2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.520666
Khalil, R. Y., Tairab, H., Qablan, A., Alarabi, K., & Mansour, Y. (2023). STEM-Based Curriculum and Creative Thinking in High School Students. Education Sciences, 13(12).https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121195
Kim, J., & Ryu, S.J (2023). Enhancing Sustainable Design Thinking Education Efficiency: A Comparative Study of Synchronous Online and Offline Classes. Sustainability, 15, 13293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813293
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning (p. 131). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3
Krab-Hüsken, L. E., Pei, L., de Vries, P. G., Lindhoud, S., Paulusse, J. M. J., Jonkheijm, P., & Wong, A. S. Y. (2023). Conceptual Modeling Enables Systems Thinking in Sustainable Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4577-4584. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00337
Kurek, J., Brandli, L. L., Leite Frandoloso, M. A., Lange Salvia, A., & Mazutti, J. (2023). Sustainable Business Models Innovation and Design Thinking: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020988
Liverpool, L. (2021). Researchers from global south under-represented in development research. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02549-9
Lund, B. D. (2022). Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind? Accountability in Research, 29(4), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1913124
Man, J. P., Weinkauf, J. G., Tsang, M., & Sin, D. D. (2004). Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. European Journal of Epidemiology, 19(8), 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ejep.0000036571.00320.b8
Mardiah, A., Irwanto, I., & Afrizal, A. (2023). Taking Design Thinking to Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review Over a Past Decade. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(3), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36i3/23094
McLaughlin, J. E., Lake, D., Chen, E., Guo, W., Knock, M., & Knotek, S. (2023). Faculty experiences and motivations in design thinking teaching and learning. Front. Educ. 8, 1172814. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1172814
Moffett, J., Little, R., Illing, J., de Carvalho Filho, M., & Bok, H. (2023). Establishing psychological safety in online design-thinking education: a qualitative study. Learning Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09474-w
Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., Fragkaki, M., & Dimitropoulos, K. (2023). Online Professional Development on Educational Neuroscience in Higher Education Based on Design Thinking. Information, 14, 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070382
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00033-4
Phommanee, W., Plangsorn, B., & Siripipattanakul, S. (2023). A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artifcial. MIT press.
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
Smith, R. C., Iversen, O. S., & Hjorth, M. (2015). Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002
Steinbeck, R. (2011). Building creative competence in globally distributed courses through design thinking. Revista Comunicar, 19(37), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-02
Tarazona-Alvarez, B., Lucas-Dominguez, R., Paredes-Gallardo, V., Alonso-Arroyo, A., & Vidal-Infer, A. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in the field of lingual orthodontics. Head & Face Medicine, 15(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0207-7
Tsai, C. A., Song, M. Y. W., Lo, Y. F., & Lo, C. C. (2023). Design thinking with constructivist learning increases the learning motivation and wicked problem-solving capability—An empirical research in Taiwan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101385
Vaugh, T., Finnegan-Kessie, T., Donnellan, P., & Oswald, T. (2020). The potential of Design Thinking to enable change in Higher Education. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 12(3), Article 3. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/505
VanGronigen, B. A., Bailes, L. P., & Saylor, M. L. (2022). “Stuck in this wheel”: The use of design thinking for change in educational organizations. Journal of Educational Change, 24, 699–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09462-6
Velu, S.R. (2023). Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect. Sustainability, 15, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010024
von Thienen, J. P.A., Weinstein, T. J., & Meinel, C. (2023) Creative metacognition in design thinking: exploring theories, educational practices, and their implications for measurement. Front. Psychol., 14, 1157001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157001
Woraphiphat, I., & Roopsuwankun, P. (2023). The impact of online design thinking-based learning on entrepreneurial intention: the case of vocational college. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00278-z
Zarate-Perez, E., Cornejo-Carbajal, C., Melgarejo-Alcántara, M., Ramos-Moreno, J., & Acevedo-Carrillo, M. (2023). Design Thinking Capabilities in the STEAM Education: A bibliometric Analysis. Proceedings of the 21th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI 2023): “Leadership in Education and Innovation in Engineering in the Framework of Global Transformations: Integration and Alliances for Integral Development”. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2023.1.1.294
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Teresa Ramos Quispe, Luis Miguel Cangalaya Sevillano, Dennis Arias Chávez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides free, immediate access to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public, which fosters a greater exchange of global knowledge.
Authors who publish in Areté, Revista Digital del Doctorado en Educación, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work, as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal and not to be used for commercial purposes.
- The contents and images included in the articles are the responsibility of the author(s). Areté, Revista Digital del Doctorado en Educación, is not responsible for the information included in them.
- Authors agree with the license of use used by the journal, with the self-archiving conditions and with the open access policy.
- Authors are allowed to disseminate electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) the published version of their work, as it favors its earlier circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
- In case of reuse of published works, the existence and specifications of the license of use must be mentioned, as well as the authorship and original source of publication.
