Validación del cuestionario de percepción de la importancia, utilidad y estructura del programa de estudios en la planificación microcurricular
Palabras clave:
psicometría, validación de instrumentos, Silabo, competenciasResumen
Objetivo: construir y validar el cuestionario de percepción de la importancia, utilidad y estructura del sílabo en la planificación microcurricular. Metodología: estudio instrumental, prospectivo, enfoque cuantitativo. Participantes: se empleó el método Delphi juicio de 6 expertos. Para validación del constructo participaron 91 personas entre docentes y estudiantes de la Universidad Católica de Cuenca. Instrumento: Se diseñaron dos instrumentos, para docentes y estudiantes, EVSIUC-2021; con 2 secciones: datos de identificación, y la evaluación del sílabo elaborado bajo dos dimensiones: 1) Estructura y 2) Utilidad/Importancia., con escala tipo Likert. Análisis estadístico: prueba de normalidad de Shapiro Wilk; el coeficiente omega descrito por McDonald, el análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) para validar el constructo y el programa R. Resultados: el cuestionario docentes; expertos demostraron validez de contenido superior a 0,58, se eliminaron 4 ítems y se obtuvo una validez global de 0,79. el Cuestionario estudiantes tuvo una razón de validez de 0,58, se eliminó 1 ítem y se obtuvo una validez global de 0,81. Prueba piloto no se ajustaron a criterios paramétricos p=,000. Prueba de McDonald arrojó 0,815 en la encuesta a docentes y 0,981 en el cuestionario de estudiantes. Satisfacción global: docentes 88%, estudiantes 80%; utilidad, importancia, estructura: docentes 45,5%, estudiantes 80%.
Descargas
Citas
Merchán M, Tapia A, Carrera A, Fuentes C. Comparative study of the curricular elements of the syllabus in universities in Spain, Portugal and Ecuador. 2018. Rev Inclusions [cited April 15, 2021]; 5(special issue):63-77. Available from: http://www.archivosrevistainclusiones.com/gallery/5%20vol%205%20num%20 4%202018ornelasnavarijooctubrediciembrerv%20inclu.pdf
Jerez O, Hasbún B, Rittershussen S. Syllabus design in higher education: a methodological proposal.2015. Editorial Universidad de Chile. https://www.plataforma.uchile.cl/libros/SYLLABUS_01_dic.pdf
Zeta A. Jimenez R. Evaluation of competency-based syllabi in the faculty of Business Science 2020. Rev. CONRADO, [Cited 16 April 2020]; 16(75):341-348. Available at: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990- 86442020000400341
Calderón M. Microcurricular planning: a tool for innovation in educational practices. 2019. Rev. Rehuso, [cited: 16, 04 2021]; 4(2):103-111. Retrieved from: https://revistas.utm.edu.ec/index.php/Rehuso/article/view/1684
Antesana R. Syllabus by competencies in the Faculty of Education of the National University of Huancavelica. 2015. Rev. Horizonte de la ciencia. 5(8):97-104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318843977_Silabo_por_competencias
_en_la_Facultad_de_Educacion_de_la_Universidad_Nacional_de_Huancavelica
Ministry of Education Ecuador. Pedagogical Improvement Program 2018. [cited: April 16, 2021]; Available from: https://educacion.gob.ec/mejoramiento- pedagogico/
UN-UNESCO. 2017 we must educate by competencies. https://competenciasdelsiglo21.com/onu-unesco-educar-competencias/
Quiroz S, Maturana Castillo J, Maturana Castillo D. A model proposal to introduce active methodologies in higher education. 2017. Rev. Innov educ. [cited: April 17,2021]; 17(73), 117-131. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665- 26732017000100117&lng=es&tlng=es
Zamora R, Mantilla M, Pullas P. Higher education in Ecuador: Current situation and quality improvement factors. 2017. Rev. Echoes of the Academy [cited: 20 April 2021]; 6(3):218-224. Available from: http://revistasojs.utn.edu.ec/index.php/ecosacademia/article/view/72/56
Organic Law of Higher Education LOES.2010. [cited: 20 April 2021]; Art.95-96 Available from:
https://www.siteal.iiep.unesco.org/sites/default/files/sit_accion_files/ec_6011.pd f
Calderón A. Techniques and strategies for information search in microcurricular planning development processes. 2019. Rev ReHuSo. Humanistic and Social Sciences. 4(2):103-111.
file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/2148-37-6963-1-10-20191231.pdf
Tobón S. Competency-based education. Complex thinking, curriculum design and didactics. 2008.
file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/Competency-based trainingSergioTobn%20(1).pdf
Ramírez G, Huertas A, Systematization of syllabus with a competency approach: curricular experiences of the department of nursing of women and children. Faculty of Nursing -UNT. 2014. Rev. Enferm. investig. Desarro. 12(2):72-84.
https://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/facenf/issue/viewFile/152/186
Pérez A, Gallar Y, Barrios E. Strategy for microcurricular design by learning outcomes in the university context. 2018. Rev Espacios, [cited: April 22, 2021]; 39(52):31-37. Available from: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n52/a18v39n52p31.pdf
Barros R, Tapia S, Chuchuca Basantes F, Chuchuca Basantes I. Acting university syllabus in pedagogical sciences potentialities and limitations at the University of Guayaquil. 2018. Rev. Lasallian Research [cited: April 17, 2021]; 15(2):327-339. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlsi/v15n2/1794-4449-rlsi-15-02-327.pdf. DOI: 10.22507/rli.v15n2a25.
Barrazueta J, Bravo F, Trelles C. New proposal to carry out a microcurricular planning in the area of mathematics. 2018. Rev. Reserach Journal UIDE INNOVA ISSN, 2477-9024. 3(9):63-86. https://revistas.uide.edu.ec/index.php/innova/article/view/643/1175
Núñez N. et.al. The curriculum by competencies in the university: a pilot experience. 2015. Rev. Iberoamericana de Educación, [cited: April 22, 2021]; 6(1). Available from: https://rieoei.org/historico/deloslectores/6051Nunez.pdf
Fernández R, Avello R, Palmero D, Sánchez S, Quintana M. Validation of instruments as a guarantee of credibility in scientific research. 2019. Rev. Cubana de Medicina Militar, [cited: April 22, 20121]; 48(2). Available from: http://www.revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/390/331
Ato M, López-García JJ, Benavente A. A classification system for research designs in psychology. An psicol [Internet]. 2013;29(3):1038-59. Available at: http://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/178511
Montero I, León OG. A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology [Internet]. 2007;7(3):847-62. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33770318.pdf
Galicia Alarcón LA, Balderrama Trápaga JA, Edel Navarro R. Content validity by expert judgment: proposal of a virtual tool. Ap [Internet]. 2017;9(2):42-53. Available at: http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/993
Tristán-López A. Modification to Lawshe's model for quantitative judgement of the content validity of an objective instrument. Advances in Measurement [Internet]. 2008;6(1):37-48. Available at: http://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/lab_psicometria/application/files/9716/0463/3 548/VOL_6._Articulo4_Indice_de_validez_de_contenido_37-48.pdf
Hernández Sampieri R, Cuevas Romo A, Mendoza Torres CP. Fundamentos de investigación. 1st ed. Mexico City: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2017. 265 p.
Barrios E, Delgado U. Design, and validation of the questionnaire "Attitude towards research in university students". Rev Innova Educ [Internet]. 2020;2(2):280-302. Available at: http://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/79
Collet C, Nascimento JV, Folle A, Ibáñez SJ. Construction and validation of an instrument for the analysis of sports training in volleyball. Cuad psicol deporte [Internet]. 2018;19(1):178-91. Available at: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/cpd/v19n1/1578-8423-cpd-19-1-178.pdf
Jara CR, Mayor-Ruiz C. Exploring the Construction of Teaching Identity in Health Professionals: Instrument Design and Validation. Form Univ [Internet]. 2019;12(1):13-24. Available at: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718- 50062019000100013&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Leyton-Román M, Mesquita S, Jiménez-Castuera R. Validation of the Spanish Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaire. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology [Internet]. 2021;21(1):1-9. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1697260021000090
Toapanta-Pinta PC, Céspedes-Granda SR, Núñez-Hurtado PJ, Vasco-Morales S. Follow-up instrument to syllabus: questionnaire validation process. BJD [Internet]. 2020;6(9):65940-7. Available at: https://www.brazilianjournals.com/index.php/BRJD/article/view/16260/13294
Urbano-Contreras A, Iglesias-García MT, Martínez-González RA. Design and validation of the Couple Time-Sharing Scale (TCP). Psychol soc educ [Internet]. 2019;11(2):165-75. Available at: https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/psye/article/view/1909
López Vázquez R, Tobón Tobón S, Veytia Bucheli MG, Juárez Hernández LG. Construct validation of two instruments to evaluate the mediation process in the classroom to favor educational inclusion. Rev Fuentes [Internet]. 2020;22(2):153-64. Available at: https://institucional.us.es/revistas/fuente/22_2/22.2.04_10765_F.pdf
Pelegrín Rodríguez A, Reyes Hernández I, Pompa Ríos LM, Gámez Azaharez Y, Álvarez Rodríguez JM, Dupotei Varela NM. Design and validation of a questionnaire for the determination of educational needs in patients. Rev Mex Cienc Farm [Internet]. 2016;47(1):77-96. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57956609007
Payá M, Gros B, Piqué B, Rubio L. Co-creation and validation of instruments for the integration of experiential knowledge in teacher education. Profr rev curríc form profr. 2018;22(1):441-60.
Ventura-León JL, Caycho-Rodríguez T. The Omega coefficient: an alternative method for reliability estimation. Rev.latinoam.cienc.soc.niñez juv. 2017;15(1):625-7. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/773/77349627039.pdf
Ferrando PJ, Anguiano-Carrasco C. Factor analysis as a research technique in psychology. Pap Psicol [Internet]. 2010;31(1):18-33. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/778/77812441003.pdf
Guerrero Pulido JF. Construct validation of a questionnaire related to the strategic diagnosis of ICT in higher education. Case study. Acción pedagóg [Internet]. 2018;27(1):22-33. Available at: http://www.saber.ula.ve/handle/123456789/46624
Escobedo Portillo MT, Hernández Gómez JA, Estebané Ortega V, Martínez Moreno G. Structural equation models: Characteristics, phases, construction, application and results. Cienc Trab [Internet]. 2016;18(55):16-22. Available at: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718- 24492016000100004&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. EJBRM [Internet]. 2008;6(1):53-60. Available at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanar t
López Aguado M, Gutiérrez Provecho L. How to perform and interpret an exploratory factor analysis using SPSS. Reire [Internet]. 2019;12(2):1-14. Available at: http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/REIRE/article/view/reire2019.12.227057
Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernández-Baeza A, Tomás-Marco I. The exploratory factor analysis of items: a practical, revised and updated guide. analesps [Internet]. 2014;30(3):1151-69. Available at: http://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/199361
López R, Avello R, Palmero D, Sánchez S, Quintana M. Validation of instruments as a guarantee of credibility in scientific research, 2019. Rev. Cubana de Medicina Familiar, [cited May 28, 2021]; 28(2). Available from: http://www.revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/390/331
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 AVFT – Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
