DSpace About DSpace Software
 

SABER UCV >
1) Investigación >
Artículos Publicados >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://saber.ucv.ve/handle/10872/15431

Title: Use and Abuse of Laboratory Tests in Clinical Immunology: Critical Considerations of Eight Widely Used Diagnostic Procedures
Authors: BENTWICH, Z.
BIANCO COLMENARES, NICOLÁS E.
JÄGER, L.
HOUBA, V.
LAMBERT, P. H .
KNAPP, W.
ROSE, N.
SELIGMANN, M.
THOMPSON, R.
TORRIGIANI, G.
DE WECK, A.
Keywords: immunoglobulins
Diagnostic
Procedures
radial immunodiffusion
nephelometry
nephelometer
Issue Date: 1982
Publisher: CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
Series/Report no.: Vol. 24;pp 122-138
Abstract: Many methods for the quantitative assessment of immunoglobulins have been described. Two of them are currently of the most value and of comparable accuracy: (1) radial immunodiffusion (RID) and (2) nephelometry. When patient load is relatively low, RID will probably remain the method of choice. However, with a high patient load and if nephelometer is already available, nephelometry is useful. Radial immunodiffusion has a constant coefficient of variation which, under optimal conditions , may be less than 10% except at extremely low concentrations. The limit of accurate protein measurements, using low concentrations of antisera, is about 10 mg/liter (10 μg/ml). Techniques using limited diffusion are more accurate than those with timed diffusion. With normal sera, results can be obtained after 24 hr of diffusion but more time may be required for the assessment of very high or very low levels.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10872/15431
ISSN: 0090-1229 (Linking)
0090-1229 (Print)
Appears in Collections:Artículos Publicados

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Documento 110.pdf24.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback