Food-Specific IgG Antibodies: Decoding Their Dual Role in Immune Tolerance and Food Intolerance

Abstract

Food-specific IgG antibodies, particularly those of the IgG4 subclass, have generated significant debate regarding their role in immune tolerance versus food intolerance. This article comprehensively reviews the literature on the subject, exploring evidence from healthy individuals and patient populations with varied clinical conditions. On one hand, IgG especially IgG4—is frequently detected in individuals without adverse food reactions and may represent a normal adaptive immune response to constant dietary antigen exposure, contributing to the development of regulatory T-cell–mediated tolerance. On the other hand, several studies have linked elevated foodspecific IgG levels with conditions characterized by increased intestinal permeability and inflammation, including eosinophilic esophagitis, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and autoimmune disorders. The review discusses multiple investigations where IgG-guided elimination diets have yielded symptomatic improvements, suggesting a potential benefit for targeted dietary interventions. However, these findings are tempered by the observation that IgG antibodies are commonly present in asymptomatic individuals, thereby questioning their specificity as markers of adverse food reactions. Current diagnostic guidelines from leading allergy and immunology organizations discourage routine IgG testing for food allergies and intolerances, highlighting that these antibodies might instead indicate exposure or underlying inflammation rather than an actual pathogenic mechanism. There is a need for well-controlled, large-scale studies to clearly define the clinical relevance of food-specific IgG responses. Until more substantial evidence is provided, clinicians are advised to interpret IgG results cautiously and to consider them within the broader context of each patient’s clinical presentation before recommending restrictive dietary changes.