Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of the American Technique vs the modified Technique in relation to Surgeon comfort

Authors

Keywords:

Colecistectomía laparoscópica, Confort, Cirujanos

Abstract

Introduction: Surgeons reported exertion and musculoskeletal pain during or aer a procedure. Modifying the insertion of the trocar located in the clavicular midline to be placed in the midline, to improve the surgeon's posture. At the Hospital Universitario de Caracas, the modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique is frequently performed to reduce the sensation of effort and pain during the surgical act. The study of comfort elements for the surgeon with this modified technique is proposed. Methods: A prospective, descriptive, comparative and cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with gallbladder lithiasis at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas, from January to August 2022. Results: 77 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed, consisting of: American technique 32 (41, 6%) and the modified technique 45 (58.4%). The American technique showed the le wrist as a painful area (62.5%), and in the modified technique they reported no painful area in 91.1%. 43.8% of the surgeons did not feel comfortable with the American technique, while in the modified one 97.8% reported the comfortable technique. The surgeons reported a difficult effort in 56.3% with the American technique and with the modified one, 82.2% reported a light effort. e degree of pain in the extremities was greater in those who performed the American technique compared to the modified one, all of the results being statistically significant. Conclusion: The modified technique has advantages in terms of comfort for the surgeon and his team and can be used from the beginning of surgeon training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Mar; 210(3): 306-313. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20193893

Reyes D, Tang B, Cuschieri A. Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan; 20(1):1-13. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16333542

Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Godinez C, Meenaghan N, Catania R, et al. Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan; 23(1): 182–188. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3OjTJMH

Szeto GPY, Cheng SWK, Poon JTC, Ting ACW, Tsang RCC, Ho P. Surgeons’ static posture and movement repetitions in open and laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. 2012 Jan; 172(1): e19-31. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22079837

Rodríguez-Zamacona A, Guevara-López JA, Aragón-Quintana C. Eficacia y seguridad de la técnica francesa de colecistectomía laparoscópica. Cirugía Endoscópica. 2016; 17(2): 73–77. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3ybR95J

Aghilinejad M, Ehsani AA, Talebi A, Koohpayehzadeh J, Dehghan N. Ergonomic risk factors and musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons with three types of surgery: Open, laparoscopic, and microsurgery. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016; (30):467. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3yfwOws

Aitchison LP, Cui CK, Arnold A, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Abbott J. The ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery: a quantitative study of the time and motion of laparoscopic surgeons in live surgical environments. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(11): 5068–76. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3xPHxft

Dabholkar TY, Yardi SS, Oak SN, Ramchandani S. Objective ergonomic risk assessment of wrist and spine with motion analysis technique during simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy in experienced and novice surgeons. J Minim Access Surg. 2017; 13(2): 124–130. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3NbM817

Hardy NP, Mannion J, Johnson R, Greene G, Hehir DJ. In vivo assessment of cervical movement in surgeons-results from open and laparoscopic procedures. Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb; 190(1): 269–273. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3AfOVnt

Catanzarite T, Tan-Kim J, Whitcomb EL, Menefee S. Ergonomics in Surgery: A Review. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan; 24(1): 1-12. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3n9LHtJ

Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Totté ER, Pierie JPEN. Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun; 23(6): 1279–1285. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18830751

Zahiri HR, Addo A, Park AE. Musculoskeletal Disorders in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Adv Surg. 2019 Sep; 53: 209–220. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3NhlyUn

Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Klein R, Park A. Methodological infrastructure in surgical ergonomics: a review of tasks, models, and measurement systems. Surg Innov. 2007 Sep; 14(3): 153–167. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3bi0UpX

Arguedas-Arguedas O. Tipos de diseño en estudios de investigación Biomédica. Acta Méd Costarric. 2010 ; 52(1): 16–18.

Shariat A, Cleland JA, Danaee M, Alizadeh R, Sangelaji B, Kargarfard M, et al. Borg CR-10 scale as a new approach to monitoring office exercise training. Work. 2018 Sep 18; 60(4): 549–554. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3xSgXlN

Cid J, Acuña JP, De Andrés J, Díaz L, Gómez-Caro L. ¿Qué y cómo evaluar al paciente con dolor crónico? Evaluación del paciente con dolor crónico. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2014 Jul; 25(4): 687–697. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3A3rmxR

Araya J. Percepción de esfuerzo físico mediante uso de escala de Borg. Rev Médica Sección ergonomía, Salud Ocupacional Instituto de salud pública de Chile. 2019; 3. Disponible en : https://www.ispch.cl/documento/nota-tecnica-n75/

Larach JR. Colecistectomía Laparoscópica. Rev Cirugía. 1992. 7(esp.): 21-24. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3ubd62s.

Published

2022-12-09

How to Cite

Vera, J., & Rodríguez, E. (2022). Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of the American Technique vs the modified Technique in relation to Surgeon comfort. Revista Digital De Postgrado, 11(3), e349. Retrieved from http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_dp/article/view/25227