Challenges of AI systems and applications for education and citizenship formation

Authors

  • Luz Marina Barreto Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, University, Education, Citizenship

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenges posed to our concepts of knowledge, reality and truth (and by extension to the places traditionally endowed with the task of defining them, i.e., modern universities) by the new systems of generative artificial intelligence. It conveys the idea that information cannot be understood as knowledge without emptying the latter from its genuine philosophical meaning as a conceptualization of reality that carries true meaning. As a result of the confusion between information and true knowledge, systems that can successfully manage semantic meaning, as all digital and machine learning systems have spectacularly learned to do in the last decades, will nevertheless fail in their capacity to bring about rational consensuses among persons. This happens because our capacity to model reality solely with logic and mathematical functions is limited and therefore my paper stresses the role a well-funded and unabashed university has to play in understanding and regulating all systems of artificial intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luz Marina Barreto, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela

Profesora Titular y Jefa del Departamento de Filosofía Teorética de la Escuela de Filosofía de la UCV. Doctora en Filosofía de la Universidad Libre de Berlín, Magister Scientiarum en Ciencias de la Computación de la Universidad Central de Venezuela, Diplomada en Teología de la UCAB y Licenciada en Filosofía de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. Directora del Instituto de Filología “Andrés Bello” de la Universidad Central de Venezuela y Directora del Doctorado de Filosofía de la misma universidad.

References

Anderson, P. (1972). More is different. Revista Science, Vol. 177. 4047.

Barabási, A. L. (2018). The Formula. Hachette Book Group.

Barreto, L.M. (2018). Estudio de dos paradigmas de modelado de tópicos aplicados sobre un conjunto de datos tomados de una red social. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad Central de Venezuela. http://saber.ucv.ve/handle/10872/20186

Barreto, L.M. (2022). Rational consensus and deliberative democracy in complex societies dominated by online social media interactions. Revista Episteme NS, 42. http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_ens/article/view/26591

Barreto, L.M. (2023 a). Una escuela alemana. Los orígenes de la Escuela de Filosofía de la UCV. Revista Trópico Absoluto. Revista de Crítica Pensamiento e Ideas. https://n9.cl/4whs1

Barreto, L.M. (2023b). Sobre la tal vez imposible universalidad del conocimiento. Revista Trópico Absoluto. Revista de Crítica Pensamiento e Ideas. https://n9.cl/4jlr8

Barreto, L.M. y Núñez, H. (2020). Una exploración de la semántica del concepto de ‘Derechos’ en Twitter. Revista Apuntes Filosóficos, 30(48). http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_af/article/view/23753/144814489981

Caldarelli, G. (2007). Scale-free Networks. Complex Webs in Nature and Technology. Oxford University Press.

Castellano, F. y Loreto (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. The Americal Physical Society, No. 81.

D’Souza, R.M. (2015). The Mathematics of Influence and Opinion Analysis. You Tube, 2015, Canal @UCDavisSocialSciences.

Einstein, A. (1905). Über die von der molekularkinetischen theorie der wärme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden flüssigkeiten suspendierten teilchen. Annalen Der Physik, 322:8, 549-560. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19053220806

Gilson, É. (2004, orig. 1948). La unidad de la experiencia filosófica. Rialp.

Gleick, J. (2011). The information: a history, a theory, a flood. Pantheon Books, 2011.

Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78:6, 1360-1380.

Heidegger, M. (orig. 1927). Ser y tiempo. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Kissinger, H., Schmidt E. y Huttenlocher, D. (2022). The Age of AI. John Murray Publishers.

Lonergan, B. (2005). Insight, a study on human understanding. University of Toronto Press.

Lucas, J. R. (1961). Minds, Machines and Gödel. Philosophy, XXXVI.

Mobilia, M. (2003). Does a Single Zealot Affect an Infinite Group of Voters? Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 028701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.028701

Perra, N., Rocha, L.E.C. (2019). Modelling opinion dynamics in the age of algorithmic personalisation. Scientific Reports 9, 7261 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43830-2

Popper, K., (1963). Conjeturas y refutaciones. El desarrollo del conocimiento científico. Paidós Básica.

Shannon, C. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3).

Spitzer S.J., Robert J. (2015). The Soul’s Upward Yearning, Ignatius Press. San Francisco.

Strawson, P.F. (1992). Analysis and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, (2021, orig. 1939). Investigaciones filosóficas. Editorial Trotta.

Wolfram, S. (2023). How to Think Computationally About AI, the Universe and Everything. TED, Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLMZAHyrpyo&t=423s.

Published

2024-10-18

How to Cite

Barreto, L. M. (2024). Challenges of AI systems and applications for education and citizenship formation. Areté, Doctorate in Education Digital Journal, 10(ee), 213–226. Retrieved from http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_arete/article/view/29490